Comparing 3+2 Axis vs True 5 Axis CNC Routers: What You Need to Know for Complex Machining
When evaluating CNC router options for complex components, engineers and manufacturers often encounter two terms: 3+2 axis and true 5 axis. While both involve five axes of movement, their operational capabilities, machining strategies, and applications differ significantly.
This article provides a detailed technical comparison between 3+2 axis and true 5 axis CNC routers, focusing on geometry, process efficiency, and suitability for complex machining scenarios. The goal is to inform engineering decisions based on practical performance, not marketing claims.
Table of Contents
Understanding the Difference: 3+2 Axis vs True 5 Axis
3+2 Axis CNC Routers
Moves three linear axes simultaneously (X, Y, Z)
Two rotary axes (A, C) are used in fixed positions for each machining operation
Often referred to as “positional 5 axis”
Key Characteristics
Tool orientation is static during cutting
Each new orientation requires repositioning and possibly a new setup
Reduces setup count compared to 3 axis, but not fully continuous
True 5 Axis CNC Routers
3+2 Axis CNC Routers
Moves three linear axes simultaneously (X, Y, Z)
Two rotary axes (A, C) are used in fixed positions for each machining operation
Often referred to as “positional 5 axis”
Key Characteristics
Tool orientation is static during cutting
Each new orientation requires repositioning and possibly a new setup
Reduces setup count compared to 3 axis, but not fully continuous
True 5 Axis CNC Routers
Simultaneous movement along three linear axes and two rotary axes
Tool orientation continuously adjusts during cutting
Supports complex curves, undercuts, and free-form surfaces in a single setup
Key Characteristics
Eliminates multiple re-clamps for multi-face machining
Smooth, continuous toolpaths improve surface finish
Requires advanced controller and CAM software
Practical Differences in Machining
| Feature | 3+2 Axis | True 5 Axis |
|---|---|---|
| Tool Orientation | Fixed per operation | Continuous dynamic adjustment |
| Multi-Face Machining | Multiple setups required | Single setup possible |
| Surface Finish | Step marks more likely | Smooth, minimal finishing |
| Programming Complexity | Lower | Higher; requires advanced CAM |
| Cycle Time | Longer due to repositioning | Shorter; continuous cutting |
| Best Use Cases | Simple multi-face parts, prototype setups | Complex free-form parts, mold making, aerospace components |
Applications Where 3+2 Axis Is Sufficient
Components with limited curvature or angular surfaces
Parts where precision is required but complex tool tilting is not critical
Small- to medium-volume production with modest surface finish requirements
Example:
Flat or lightly curved furniture panels
Simple automotive brackets
Some plastic prototypes
Applications Where True 5 Axis Excels
Multi-face components with compound curves or undercuts
Aerospace and automotive parts with tight volumetric tolerances
Mold-making and composite tooling with intricate free-form surfaces
Sculpted wood panels and artistic architectural elements
True 5 axis machining reduces setups, minimizes errors, and maintains optimal cutting angles for high surface quality.
Workflow and Efficiency Considerations
Setup Reduction
True 5 axis machining allows single-setup completion, improving throughput and consistency
3+2 axis reduces setups compared to 3 axis but may still require multiple orientations
Toolpath Optimization
3+2 axis toolpaths are simpler and easier to generate
True 5 axis requires advanced CAM software for smooth interpolation, collision avoidance, and continuous tool orientation
Operator Skill
3+2 axis machines are easier to operate for operators with basic CNC training
True 5 axis requires expertise in multi-axis kinematics, toolpath verification, and collision management
Precision and Surface Finish
True 5 axis CNC routers achieve higher volumetric accuracy on complex parts
Continuous tool orientation reduces scalloping, step marks, and surface irregularities
3+2 axis may leave visible step marks when machining curved surfaces unless multiple intermediate setups are used
Cost vs Performance Considerations
Initial Investment
3+2 axis machines are generally less expensive
True 5 axis machines have higher capital cost due to:
Advanced control systems
High-precision rotary axes
Greater mechanical rigidity
ROI Factors
Throughput improvements, reduced scrap, and minimized secondary finishing may offset higher upfront cost in complex part production
For simpler parts or low-volume production, 3+2 axis may provide adequate return on investment
Maintenance and Calibration
True 5 axis routers require careful calibration of rotary axes and linear axes to maintain volumetric accuracy
3+2 axis machines are less demanding but still require routine maintenance for long-term precision
Decision-Making Guidelines
Assess Part Geometry:
Free-form surfaces and undercuts → True 5 axis
Simple angled surfaces → 3+2 axis
Production Volume:
High-volume, complex parts → True 5 axis
Low-volume, simple multi-face parts → 3+2 axis
Skill Level and CAM Capabilities:
Limited CAM expertise → 3+2 axis
Advanced CAM team available → True 5 axis
Budget Constraints:
Limited budget with basic part requirements → 3+2 axis
Budget available for efficiency and high-quality output → True 5 axis
Frequently Asked Questions
3+2 axis uses static tool orientation per setup, while true 5 axis continuously adjusts the tool during cutting.
Can 3+2 axis machines handle complex curves?
Only to a limited extent; multiple setups are required for complex multi-face surfaces.
Which is faster for multi-face parts?
True 5 axis is faster because it can machine multiple faces in a single setup.
Is CAM programming more difficult for true 5 axis?
Yes, it requires advanced software capable of continuous interpolation and collision avoidance.
Do true 5 axis routers always justify the higher cost?
They justify the cost primarily for parts with complex geometry, tight tolerances, or high surface finish requirements.
Can 3+2 axis machines produce high-quality surfaces?
Yes, but it may require additional setups and secondary finishing.
Conclusion
Choosing between a 3+2 axis and true 5 axis CNC router depends on part complexity, production volume, surface finish requirements, operator skill, and budget. True 5 axis routers excel in machining multi-face, free-form components in a single setup, offering superior precision, reduced cycle times, and smoother surfaces. Conversely, 3+2 axis machines are sufficient for simpler parts, lower complexity, or budget-conscious applications.
An informed choice ensures optimal operational efficiency, precision, and return on investment in industrial production.
Products Categories
Recently News
Why Choose Us
1.Experienced CNC manufacturer.
2.Strong R&D and innovation.
3.High-quality machine components.
4.Custom solutions available.
5.Strict quality control.
6.Fast production and delivery.
7.Professional technical support.
8.Competitive factory pricing.
9.Trusted by global customers.
10.One-stop CNC solutions.
Contact Us
- Wechat: ExtraCNC
- Whatsapp/Moblie:0086 15562628072
- Email: [email protected]
EN 
AR 
EO 
IT 
DE 
KO 
JA 
RU 
AZ 
BG 
CS 
DA 
EL 
ES 
FR 
ID 
LV 
NL 
ML 
PT 
TT 
SL 
TH 
UZ 
UK 
SV 
TR